Alvin carl plantinga born 1932 is an american analytic philosopher who works primarily in the fields of philosophy of religion, epistemology particularly on issues involving epistemic justification, and logic. Alvin plantinga criticizes anselms ontological argument, but he does so constructively, with a mind to reformulating the argument to avoid anselms mistakes and hopefully use deduction to prove gods existence. Plantinga s defence of the ontological argument michael tooley in chapter io of his book, the nature of necessity, alvin plantinga contends that although many versions of the ontological argument are unsound, there is at least one that is valid, and whose premises may reasonably be accepted. I think im going to agree with the parts of plantinga with which you disagree, and vice versa. Nov 11, 2017 far from victorious, plantingas argument would taste irreparable defeat and this, in more ways than one. The modal ontological argument common sense atheism. Modal ontological argument for the existence of god youtube. Plantinga developed his modal version of the ontological argument for the existence of god in his two controversial books, the nature of necessity 1974. Perhaps one might resolve to use the label ontological argument for any argument which gets classified as an ontological argument by its proponents. The contract should provide for inspections during planting to ensure that quality standards are met before payment is made. The modal ontological argument is valid in some standard systems of alethic modal logic, e. Refuting plantingas victorious ontological argument the. Variants of godels ontological proof in a natural deduction. Sipper holds a phd in education, a masters of education, and a bachelors in english.
Historically, however, the term is inextricably associated with the famous argument presented in anselms proslogion chapter ii, and with. This is especially important when planting with costshare programs. But the nomaximality premise of the rival to plantingas ontological argument seems in no relevant way different from nu. Get all the latest information on events, sales and offers. Ontological arguments for the existence of god alvin plantinga the ontological argument simplified lynne rudder baker and gareth b.
The nature of necessity, together with a series of subsequent articles, constitutes what is perhaps the most sophisticated theory of possible worlds yet to be constructed. A critique of the plantinga version of the modal ontological. Consequently, the modal ontological argument is a logical argument, but not an ontological argument in the sense of having any existential relevance. I will then go on to look at criticisms of the argument from both gaunilo and kant to see if they can show that the argument does not work and if not, why not. Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on youtube. God exists in the understanding but not in reality. The ontological argument kenneth einar himma modal versions of the ontological argument william rowe. Humanities wp brp 68hum2014 this working paper is an output of a research project implemented at the national research university higher school of economics hse.
In this post ill explain both the motivation behind alvin plantingas modal ontological argument, as well as its various steps. Dean zimmerman and alvin plantinga discuss the ontological argument for the existence of god. Sep 01, 2015 a presentation of the oa from alvin plantinga. This procedure would make good sense if one thought that there is a natural kindontological argumentswhich our practice carves out, but for which is hard to specify defining. The ontological argument alvin plantinga 1 the third theistic argument i wish to discuss is the famous ontological argument first formulated by anselm of canterbury in the eleventh century. Simple script for downloading youtube comments without using the youtube api. This argument for the existence of god has fascinated philosophers ever since anselm first stated it. Its been a while since i published on the subject, and i would have to get my head back into the detai. From these considerations of the validity of plantingas ontological argument, it appears the only, and fatal, objection to plantingas argument is that his premise 29 is necessarily false. The original argument basically examines gods place as a necessary being and unfolds logically why. Plantingas modal ontological argument explained by sean choi. Plantinga has expressed a modal logic version of the ontological argument in which he uses modal logic to.
Philosophy genius editors the ontological argument for. The existence of an unbeatable sorcerer is not only false, it is necessarily false. These ideas transformed how those within philosophy and the surrounding culture understood theism the belief in a divine reality or god. No philosophical argument for the existence of god, can be initiated with a definition of god, because god is not within human experience. Anselm, rene descartes, and many other theologians throughout the centuries. Alvin plantingas modal ontologicals argument is a irrefutable logical argument for the existence of god. Reassessing plantingas ontological argument for god. A famous philosophical argument for gods existence.
Free plant stock video footage licensed under creative commons, open source, and more. The ontological argument part 1 william lane craig duration. Jun 28, 2009 dean zimmerman and alvin plantinga discuss the ontological argument for the existence of god. Ahh well regarding the modal argument, there is a pretty wide literature on the connection between conceivability and possibility. In this essay i shall describe anselms ontological argument and look at how it may prove gods existence.
William lane craig speaks on the ontological argument for god. Only by disputations and debate may truths about god emerge. Lit genius the ontological argument for the existence of god. Is the modal ontological argument for god a sound proof. Philosophy genius editors the ontological argument for the. The ontological argument peter millican any argument which attempts to prove gods existence a priori based only on his nature can be termed an ontological argument. Plantinga has been one of the principal figures involved in the attempt to clarify and understand the metaphysics of possible worlds. After kants, and others, critiques of anselm, most philosophers regarded the ontological argument as.
A video response to inspiringphilosphy and anticitizenx regarding alvin plantingas modal ontological argument for gods existence. Jan 14, 2014 alvin plantingas modal ontological argument posted on january 14, 2014 by logan stewart 4 comments in this video, the modal ontological argument developed by alvin plantinga in his work, the nature of necessity, is explained in easy to understand terms. He spent nineteen years as a professor at calvin college, then eighteen years at the university of notre dame, and returned to calvin college in 2010. Alvin carl plantinga born 1932 is an american analytic philosopher who works primarily in the. Free tree stock video footage 2,715 free downloads.
Its antecedent has as its object a possible world, allowing plantinga to call into service the full armoury of possible world logic. Below are short, animated videos on philosopher alvin plantingas most important contributions to the philosophy of religion. However, plantingas version seems to avoid this it doesnt, though. This paper presents detailed formalizations of ontological arguments in a simple modal natural deduction calculus. His justice is maximal, his benevolence is maximal, etc. The ontological argument part 1 william lane craig youtube. They try to gain objective meaning from an entirely subjective word, and fail because of it. Is showing that its possible that god exists enough to also show that god actually exists. For those who dont know, the ontological argument tries to prove the existence of god in four steps. Has any current theist ever converted due to the ontological argument. It is really just the assertion that a maximally great being is not possible, and thus merely an assertion to the effect that plantingas first and key premise is false. Ontological arguments stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Plantinga begins his discussion of the ontological argument by borrowing seventeenth century philosopher leibniz idea of possible worlds.
Where the conflict really lies science, religion, and naturalism alvin plantinga. William lane craig considers alvin plantinga s version of the ontological argument as having the best chance of being cogent wlc 2004, p. Plantingas fundamental error is in assuming that philosophy is about things. Alvin plantingas modal ontological argument fundamental reason. Free plant stock video footage 3,562 free downloads. It is time now to consider one motivation a believer may have for accepting a given version of the ontological argument, namely abstract objects.
Plantinga s modal ontological argument has its roots in anselms original ontological argument. So, for example, there is a possible world in which i am able to execute dazzling slam dunks and a possible world in which i am lucky to make a basket at all. Anselm to contemporary philosophers alvin plantinga, richard taylor on. Free tree stock video footage licensed under creative commons, open source, and more. Sep 20, 2010 does any christian believe the ontological argument. What is the best refutation of plantingas modal ontological. Here, plantinga attempted to use the philosophical concept of possible worlds to show the necessary nature of gods existence. He wants to show that if it is even possible that god, so thought of, exists, then it is true and necessarily true that he does.
Critique of the ontological argument david duncombe. Plantingas ontological argument the third modalised version of the ontological argument was advanced in 1974 by alvin plantinga in his book the nature of necessity. For my purposes, ill work with a simplified version of that argument which plantinga presents in his book, the nature of necessity clarendon press, 1974, pp. Most forms of the ontological argument rely on the premise that existence is greater than nonexistence, or that necessary existence is greater than conditional existence.
514 1453 655 870 61 1161 1106 1289 935 40 1295 870 527 263 231 807 1442 1319 234 410 982 878 1492 624 174 97 735 1429 207 1595 1093 593 939 592 509 397 236 940 832 529 1357 1445 39 809 449 566 1253